Zahnärztliche Mitteilungen Nr. 15

zm 108, Nr. 15-16, 16.8.2018, (1721) Literatur: 1. O‘Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al.: Effectiveness of early ortho- dontic treatment with the Twin- block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(3):234–43; quiz 339. 2. Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C.: Outcomes in a 2-phase rando- mized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofa- cial Orthop 2004;125(6):657–67. 3. King GJ, McGorray SP, Wheeler TT, Dolce C, Taylor M.: Compari- son of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123(5):489–96. 4. Kochel J, Meyer-Marcotty P, Witt E, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A.: Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: A com- parative long-term study. Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fort- schritte der Kieferorthopädie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopädie 2012;73(2):91–103. 5. Faltin KJ, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, et al.: Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy. Angle Orthod 2003;73(3):221–30. 6. Freeman DC, McNamara JA, Jr., Baccetti T, Franchi L, Frankel C.: Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Frankel. Ameri- can journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 2009;135(5):570 e1–6; discussion 70–1. 7. Falck F.: Langzeitergebnisse bei der Behandlung des Distalbisses mit dem Funktionsregler. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1991;52(5):263–7. 8. Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC.: Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dento- facial Orthop 1990;98(4):340–7. 9. Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA.: Treatment effects of remova- ble functional appliances in pa- tients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur J Orthod 2015;37(4):418–34. 10. Zymperdikas VF, Koretsi V, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA.: Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2016;38(2):113–26. 11. Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R.: Analysis of efficacy of functio- nal appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(5):470–6. 12. Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC.: Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction compari- sons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4(4):228–34. 13. Harradine NW.: Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4(4):220–7. 14. Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F.: How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical. Stat Med 1989;8(4):441–54. 15. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al.: Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998;352(9128):609–13. 16. Sackett DL.: The science of the art of clinical management. Volume 19, Craniofacial Growth Series. In: Vig PS, Ribbens KA, editors. Science and clinical judgement in orthodontics. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: Center for Human Growth and Develop- ment, University of Michigan; 1986. p. 237–51. Per QR-Code gelangen Sie zu allen Leser- briefen auf zm-online. Das sagen Ihre Kollegen LESERBRIEFE AUF ZM - ONLINE Zirkonoxid Hybrid PMMA Metall Silikatkeramik Was tun? Patientin, 35 Jahre, 21 devital, 22 vital mit Fraktur, hohe ästhetische Ansprüche. Einfach COMPLEO! www.flemming-compleo.de/guide Telefon: 040/32102 444